70's futuristic technology

Programming focused drivel

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Intended Audience and Faceted Social Identities

We are heading towards a more transparent society, but at the cost of overloading our readers, duplicating information, and giving up privacy. Social networking software increases this transparency as one is able to digitize more and more of our thoughts and life. Unfortunately most tools don’t have a proper way to manage ones self-identity nor ones social identity; it’s very difficult to get content to it’s target audience without overloading all audiences with unwanted information. Tools have various levels of privacy protection, which are infrequently used.


We currently work around this issue in many ways: ?

  • Creating multiple accounts in a service?
  • Using multiple services for the same task and tying one username to one target audience?
  • Using a shared account for a couple
  • Tagging content so that viewers can listen on a specific topic?
  • Reposting content to other networks
  • ?Etc

The reality of how healthy people operate in social environments is that interaction in the physical world is highly complex and nuanced. We are multi-faceted beasts. At one moment we may be wearing our “Professional Web Dev” hat and the next wearing our “Barack Obama Supporter” hat. In the real world we often make this switches without noticing. We step out of a meeting and into the elevator and without missing a beat are able to "switch these hats". We negotiate social identities constantly for the benefit of our audience. If we communicated in an elevator the way we communicate online, it would be jarring and tedious.

We use Flickr to upload photos for different reasons: family, vacations, parties, work, foodlogs, art projects, political efforts, and supporting other publishing activities. Largely the various audiences and contexts which are the intended recipients are collapsed. Flickr lacks automated features to manage “channels” of audiences. If I upload a whiteboard diagram and a propaganda flyer, both end up in my photo stream. I can try to use tags, groups, or pools, to filter down my photos by audience, but this is labor intensive and may require too much coordination with the audience or other tools in my publishing toolchain. What is needed is a way to make these tools aware of “which hat” we are currently wearing and to only deliver content to the appropriate audience.

If I consume Jane’s activities via FriendFeed or a feed reader, I wanted it pre-filtered for her factes that interest me: Seattle, WebDev, BookReader, and DudeImDrunk. I want to never see some of her other content: ProudMom, SeahawksFan, and MyMusic. This is regardless of which tools Jane uses to author these posts: Flickr, del.icio.us, Twitter, etc.

I think the problem of capturing your current facet is related to other problems with social networking software: Information Overload, Information leaks, and Stalking. It’s possible that solving the faceted social identity problem may be a good foundation for solving the others.

2 Comments:

  • At 8:18 PM , OpenID id said...

    Austin - good points!
    I guess the choice of filters would be at both ends, right? My first thought was: what about accidental connections?

    For example, one info-throttle I'm always tempted by is the newsvine.com type of situation where you can choose the topics you're interest in and get a custom feed. But then I can't choose - I don't know ahead of time what I may potentially interested in - I don't want to filter it out before I get the chance.

    Likewise, I may know and appreciate your programmer facet - but it'd be a shame if I missed out on a political discussion because I'd pre-filtered that content...

     
  • At 12:01 AM , Blogger Austin said...

    id (Ethan), I agree, you would want to be able to negotiate filters from both ends. There are a variety of reasons why one would want to listen in on more or less filters.

    I think part of the UI aspect of this feature would be to see all of the author's filters that are available and which ones you are currently consuming.

    As time goes on an author could add and remove facets, so they don't have to sit down and create them all up front.

    In terms of privacy, I would imagine one would only make public filters discoverable; "backstage" filters would have to be entrusted before being shown as unused.

    Good questions, made me think about search engines and anonymous parties.

     

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home